Home - Viewing one post
Skepticism for the MIT crowd
|I turned up the skepticism a tad for a lunchtime talk I gave yesterday at MIT's Tech Review's EmTech conference. I feel a little like a politician saying that. But you figure that people at an MIT conference already know about the Numerati, and understand how dramatically the analysis of massive data is going to change the world. So I could dwell a little more on what could go wrong.
The main point: Most of the systems used to analyse and model human behavior are hand-me-downs from other disciplines. Some of the Numerati (especially at the work place) model us like financial instruments, each person representing a sort of mutual fund of skills, traits, connections. Others use operations research, the same science that optimizes cell phone traffic and flight schedules (and countless other things). Neither one of these approaches can come close to grappling with the complexity of human beings. But if they can figure us out enough to make us a little more efficient or a tad more profitable, they've done their job. The goal of the Numerati, after all, is improvement, not perfection (much less "truth").
So, if we develop and refine these systems, the analysis of humans evolves on analytical methods created for investments and machines. Could that be taking us in the wrong direction? I'd be interested in thoughts. I'm going to be bringing this up at Intel today, in Portland. Maybe they'll have some ideas.
Portlanders: Please come to the event this evening at Powell's!. See you there. Btw, here's Dan Farber's review of The Numerati on CNET. And here's a slideshow I did for Boston.com on 10 Emerging Technologies.
RT @marthagabriel: "It is possible to store the mind with a million facts and still be entirely uneducated."
-- Alec Bourne #quote #goodmor…
follow me on twitter
Kirkus - Kirkus Reviews
Andrew Dunn - Bloomberg News
Culture Mob - Dan Sampson
Shelfari (Amazon) - Tom Nissley
read more reviews
The Boost: an excerpt
- April 15, 2014
My horrible Superbowl weekend, in perspective
- February 3, 2014
My coming novel: Boosting human cognition
- May 30, 2013
Why Nate Silver is never wrong
- November 8, 2012
The psychology behind bankers' hatred for Obama
- September 10, 2012
"Corporations are People": an op-ed
- August 16, 2011
Wall Street Journal excerpt: Final Jeopardy
- February 4, 2011
Why IBM's Watson is Smarter than Google
- January 9, 2011
- October 3, 2010
The coming privacy boom
- August 17, 2010
The appeal of virtual
- May 18, 2010
My next book: IBM's Jeopardy mission
- March 22, 2010