Home - Viewing one post
Behavior ad campaign for Numerati: Results
|As I've been writing, the British publisher, the Vintage division of Random House, is considering changing the title for the paperback edition of the book from The Numerati to They've Got Your
The idea is to shift the target from current affairs and business
readers to popular science--and, of course, to induce casual readers to
pick it up.
With this in mind, I've been going through the results from our behavioral targeting campaign,
to see if any of the lessons learned are relevant. This campaign,
carried out last fall by AOL's Platform A, studied the behavioral
patterns on the Web of thousands of people who saw and clicked on a
series of Numerati ads. It tried to determine which types of readers
were most likely to buy the book, and which ads appealed to them most.
study started with three types of ads (some of them, admittedly,
bordering on hyperbolic): Scary ones ("Think carefully before your next
step... You are being watched by the Numerati"), Basic ones ("Can't
decide who to vote for? Let us tell you. The Numerati know your
decisions before you do.") and ads oriented toward business readers ("A
guide to 21st century living. The Numerati will change the way you
work. shop. vote. think. live.")
After initial monitoring of the audience, Platform A focused the
campaign on different types of readers: Business oriented, Arts and
review readers, and general audience.
Most relevant to the paperback cover, they found that scary ads
"generated significant response, but ads targeted to business decisions
makers actually generated the highest likelihood of reading the book."
They calculated that it cost 31 cents in advertising to entice a
business reader to consider buying the book, while it cost 50 cents to
sway a "book lover." (If you're curious about the particulars, there
are loads more details in the study.)
So does this mean that the new cover, which has a scary element to it,
will lead more browsers to pick it up, but not as many to buy it?
I don't know. But I do have serious questions about the Platform A study.
The target audience seems far too old. According to the stats, a
stunning 83% of the people studied were over 45 years old. Only 5% were
from 25 to 34 years old--an important group, I'd think. That said,
based on the audiences I've been talking to, the younger people seem to
focus less than their elders on the scary aspects of data surveillance.
RT @marthagabriel: "It is possible to store the mind with a million facts and still be entirely uneducated."
-- Alec Bourne #quote #goodmor…
follow me on twitter
Kirkus - Kirkus Reviews
Andrew Dunn - Bloomberg News
Culture Mob - Dan Sampson
Shelfari (Amazon) - Tom Nissley
read more reviews
Why Nate Silver is never wrong
- November 8, 2012
The psychology behind bankers' hatred for Obama
- September 10, 2012
"Corporations are People": an op-ed
- August 16, 2011
Wall Street Journal excerpt: Final Jeopardy
- February 4, 2011
Why IBM's Watson is Smarter than Google
- January 9, 2011
- October 3, 2010
The coming privacy boom
- August 17, 2010
The appeal of virtual
- May 18, 2010
My next book: IBM's Jeopardy mission
- March 22, 2010
- November 12, 2009
BusinessWeek cannot afford to stay within McGraw-Hill
- August 6, 2009
How to remake BusinessWeek?
- July 16, 2009